Mutual Fund Scheme Performance for NISM certification

A fund's return means little on its own. This chapter is about judging performance: against the right benchmark, against peers, after adjusting for risk, and using the disclosures SEBI requires.

Mutual FundsSeries V-A60 MCQs4 lessons13 flashcards4 memory tricks

Practise Mutual Fund Scheme Performance free

What you'll learn

  1. Benchmarks: the yardstick
    Choose a suitable benchmark for a scheme and explain two-tier benchmarking.
  2. Comparing with peers
    Use category averages, quartiles and rolling returns to compare funds fairly.
  3. Passive funds: tracking error and tracking difference
    Measure how well an index fund or ETF follows its index.
  4. Performance disclosures and the fund manager
    Read a performance table in SEBI's format and evaluate a fund manager.

Key formulas

Upside captureFund return in up months ÷ benchmark return in up months × 100
Downside captureFund return in down months ÷ benchmark return in down months × 100

Concepts explained

Benchmarks and TRI

A benchmark is the index a scheme is measured against; SEBI requires it to be a Total Return Index and uses a category-level tier-1 benchmark.

What it means

  • Should match the scheme's universe and style.
  • TRI includes dividends; PRI doesn't.
  • Additional benchmark gives a broad reference.
Example 1: PRI vs TRI
  • Fund 13%; Nifty 500 PRI 11.5%; Nifty 500 TRI 12.8%
  • Against PRI: +1.5%
  • Against TRI: +0.2%

Answer: Real outperformance is 0.2%

Tracking error and tracking difference

Tracking difference is how much an index fund's return differs from its index; tracking error is how variable that difference is.

What it means

  • Main cause of tracking difference: expenses.
  • Causes of tracking error: cash flows, rebalancing, timing.
  • Both should be low.
Example 1: Tracking difference
  • Index TRI 10.5%
  • Fund 10.2%

Answer: −0.3%

Information ratio

Information ratio = (fund return − benchmark return) ÷ tracking error: how consistently an active fund beats its benchmark.

What it means

  • Higher is better.
  • Uses the benchmark, not the risk-free rate.
Example 1: IR
  • Fund 15%, benchmark 13%
  • Tracking error 5%
  • 2 ÷ 5

Answer: 0.4

Up and down capture ratios

Capture ratios show how much of the benchmark's rises (upside) and falls (downside) a fund captured.

What it means

  • Upside > 100: rose more than the benchmark in up periods.
  • Downside < 100: fell less than the benchmark in down periods.
  • Ideal: high upside, low downside.

Memory tricks

TRI vs PRI'Total Return = Tiffin + Roti': TRI counts the dividend tiffin as well as the price roti.

TRI includes dividends reinvested; price index doesn't.

Tracking difference vs error'Difference = how far behind the train; Error = how much it wobbles': tracking difference is the gap, tracking error is its wobble.

Tracking difference: average gap from the index; tracking error: variability of the gap.

Quartiles'Q1 is the front row of the class photo': first quartile is the top 25% of peers.

Quartile 1 = top 25% of the category.

Capture ratios'Catch the sixes, dodge the bouncers': a good fund captures most of the rally and little of the fall.

Aim for high upside capture and low downside capture.

Try 3 NISM-style questions

Q1. Which measure would you use to compare two Nifty 50 ETFs?

  1. Alpha against the Nifty Smallcap 250 index
  2. Exit load only, since the returns of the two will always be identical
  3. Tracking difference, tracking error, expense ratio and trading liquidity
  4. Number of distributors
Show answer

Answer: (3) Tracking difference, tracking error, expense ratio and trading liquidity

Passive funds are judged on tracking and cost; ETFs also on liquidity.

Q2. A distributor shows a client a fund's returns against the Nifty 50 price index instead of its stated TRI benchmark. This is

  1. Misleading and against disclosure norms
  2. Required by SEBI for equity funds
  3. Better for the investor's understanding
  4. Irrelevant
Show answer

Answer: (1) Misleading and against disclosure norms

Using the wrong index flatters the fund.

Q3. In a periodic review, a single year of underperformance by an otherwise consistent fund should usually lead to

  1. Immediate redemption
  2. Doubling the investment without review
  3. Changing the investor's goal
  4. Monitoring, not an automatic switch
Show answer

Answer: (4) Monitoring, not an automatic switch

Switching has costs; one year isn't conclusive.

Practise all 60 questions Free · explanations for every option · see where you go wrong

More Mutual Funds chapters (Series V-A)